William Katz: Urgent Agenda
|
||
|
SUNDAY, JANUARY 27, 2008
What's pathetic is the attempt by some journalists, belied by all statistics, to prove that Obama showed electoral strength among different groups. He got 24 percent of the white vote. He got 80 percent of the black vote. Simply to show a numerical comparison, Jesse Jackson got 75 percent of the black vote overall in the 1984 primaries, according to The New York Times. It's possible that, in future contests, Mr. Obama will show wider appeal. But he didn't show it in South Carolina, and no spin can prove otherwise. What's also pathetic is the lack of any attempt to get Mr. Obama to provide details about the "change" he wishes to bring. No tough questions. No probing of the strange assembly of failures and leftists who serve on his foreign-policy team. One of his slogans, "Change we can believe in," reminds me of the campaign motto of former Senator Bill Brock of Tennessee: "Brill Brock believes." That was it. Look, in our busy day, who needs more details? The man is promising change. Change is good. Or is it? Senator Obama delivered a victory speech. For the most part, it was passable. It was the standard from-the-pulpit sermon dressed up as political rhetoric. But Obama also showed the chilling insensitivity he's showed often, and which has been ignored by the mainstream media. Get this quote about the coalition he claims he's built:
Say what? Young people have never had a reason to participate in politics until Barack Obama came along? Really? What about 9/11? I'd say that was a reason, wouldn't you? And you know, many young people in fact are participating, but I guess no one mentioned those absentee ballots from Iraq and Afghanistan. At the end Obama fired forth another of his slogans: "Yes. We. Can." Yes we can what? Oh, never mind.
The endorsement is a surprise. Caroline has generally conducted herself with intelligence and dignity over the years, but her endorsement has a strangeness about it. Maybe she was concerned that the Kennedy family was becoming irrelevant, which is true, and that something had to be done to switch the spotlights back on. Reading this endorsement, maybe someone should dim those lights. The endorsement is called, "A President Like My Father." Oh really? The only thing JFK and Obama have in common is that they both knew crooks in Chicago. I was in the 1960 campaign, on the staff of a U.S. senator, and we were with Kennedy often. The contrasts between Kennedy and Obama are stark. Kennedy, for example, was obsessed with national defense, even running to the right of Richard Nixon that year on military readiness. Obama? Defense? Maybe defense lawyers, but not defense. I doubt very much if you'll hear Mr. Obama pledging to bear any burden or pay any price in defense of freedom. Caroline says:
Let me gently remind Caroline Kennedy that the Reagan Revolution wasn't named after a washing machine, and that Reagan Democrats didn't become Reagan Democrats because they found the man boring. There's been plenty of inspiration, if you look beyond the Democratic National Committee to find it.
Forget the Mexican border. Maybe they ought to build that fence along the Atlantic wall.
That's from the Independent, known for its affection for Lenin. Then there's this:
That's from The Times of London, a usually staid paper. Now, those headline writers we can use here. Leave a secret hole in the fence. I'll give them a map.
Look, Jen, Bill Clinton can help, although it won't be change you can believe in.
Back later. Posted on January 27, 2008.
|
|